Direct Link: https://www.captechu.edu/privacytheriseindemand
By Dr. Jason M. Pittman, Sc.D
The demand for privacy
is at an all-time high. Worldwide, web search traffic suggests that
people are more interested in privacy today than they were ten years
ago.
While
the United States is a hotbed for privacy, largely because of the
revelations by government whistleblower Edward Snowden, other countries
are also demonstrating a surge in privacy demand. Interest in privacy
has risen more than 10% in Germany, 15% in France, and in the
Netherlands; the trend towards privacy demand has skyrocketed higher
than 50% in the past ten years. Yet, this growth in demand is not the
entire story.
The demand for privacy has also become much more
specific. That is not to say that privacy as a concept was not well
defined or understood, but rather that the need for privacy was broad.
This was particularly true in relation to technology.
Nowadays,
however, privacy demand is laser focused and targeted towards very
specific technologies. For example, whereas ten years ago the trend in
privacy demand was towards the expectation of privacy, the current trend includes distinct platforms (e.g. Facebook) and technologies (e.g. VPN or virtual private network).
I
feel that this increase is largely related to changes in how we
perceive technology as a knowledge mediator. Ten years ago, the internet
was still quite young, and information was amorphous and static.
Compare that to today when information is quite precise, highly curated,
and certainly dynamic. We have access to more information, faster than
we did before, and so does everyone else.
However, there is a material difference between data and information.
Data are pieces or points of qualitative or quantitative values. Think
about GPS coordinate for a moment (which are quantitative data).
Further, think about the GPS coordinates associated with each traffic
light you may be stopped at on your way to work. An individual stop
along a route is a single datum in the collective data of all GPS
coordinates on your way to work.
The
collection of all stops then, is simply data (plural) as well. However,
if we were to plot this GPS data on a map, we could trace your exact
route between home and work. This- the (re)construction of the A to B
route- is information. The data were analyzed and used to construct
something bigger, larger. Further, if we associated a time stamp element
with each GPS datum, we could know the precise length of time for your
trip. This too is information.
At all times, when discussing
privacy, I refer to information as opposed to unprocessed data. The
demand for privacy is rooted in information. Thus, information, unlike
the underlying data, is of concern for us.
What type of information is of concern, though?
While
my information is unique to me and your information is unique to you,
understanding why privacy is in demand necessitates consideration of
three abstract qualities of information that apply to all general cases:
parity of information, information as a currency, and the permanency of
information.
To better understand the demand for privacy, tune in next week for my explanation of these three demand drivers.
www.CapTechU.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment